In recent years, "fake news" has been a big concern for the general public. News articles posted online may or may not be based on fact, and when misinformation spreads, it's like wildfire. Is this good enough reason for legislation and regulation? In the United States, we have the first amendment. With this, the constitution states that we have rights to free expression that the government cannot infringe upon. If we were to try and pass legislation like what is currently being considered in Singapore, it would have little chance of passing. That is because the regulation being called for n Singapore is so restrictive that tech companies like Facebook could get into huge legal trouble if articles deemed by the Singaporean government as "fake news" are posted on their platform. When the government has so much power that they can deem articles as "fake news" and ban them outright, this is a problem for those concerned about freedom of expression
The way we tell stories has changed drastically over the years. At the beginning of man, oral storytelling was the only way, and then we began making music and art. By the time mass media came around, the stories we told were starting to become more complex. However, all of these examples were limited to its original medium: a painting, play, opera, movie, TV show, etc. New media has changed the way we tell stories in a big way. Online media has given storytellers the opportunity to expand their universes outside of their base piece of art. No longer does the story have to stop when the credits roll, and no longer are we confined to information given by the writers. Jenkins gives the great example of the movie, 2012 , where the creators made an entire website of backstory. Instead of filling the film up with backstory, they took the opportunity that the internet provided them to give viewers all that information in an entirely different way. By using multiple mediums, artist'